New Mods

[driller]

You can do 13s with a 2.0x sixty foot time. I did.

With 42 runs so far, my worst 60 foot this year has been a 2.061 which gave me a 13.788 ET.

 

[MarkOfDeath]

Im hoping, I went to the track for fun, and craped my pants when I hit 14.1 my best with just 410s was 14.4, I dont know what I would of run when I had both but it rips now after my new fuel pump

 

[98LSC32V]

You can do 13s with a 2.0x sixty foot time. I did.

With 42 runs so far, my worst 60 foot this year has been a 2.061 which gave me a 13.788 ET.

My 95 LSC ran a 13.8 with a 2.1 60 foot time... it also trapped over 101mph, not 97mph. That's a 40 horsepower difference.

 

[driller]

That's a 40 horsepower difference.

That's a theoretical 40 horsepower difference.

 

[98LSC32V]

I trust that "theoretical" difference more than a dyno.

 

[driller]

I trust that "theoretical" difference more than a dyno.

You're missing the point.

By "theoretical", I was implying there is no way you can take two different trap speeds from two different cars at two different locations at two different times and quantify a specific difference in HP.

 

[MarkOfDeath]

your car must be preatty slow off the line, 98lsc, I really dont have much done now, but when I throw the gears back in Im hoping for 1.8-1.9 60 foots

 

[98LSC32V]

No actually the 95 LSC was very fast off the line for having a stock torque converter and crappy Dayton street tires. I took it to the track one more time after the 13.8 and it was running back to back 2.0 60 foot times and 13.9's launching off idle with 1 cylinder not firing all the time... ended up breaking the motor that time at the track as well but that's a different story.

 

[brentalan]

Driller, what are you times now since you've done the 4.30 and headers? Do you have slips?

 

[driller]

Driller, what are you times now since you've done the 4.30 and headers? Do you have slips?

Do I have slips. :lol:

This T&T data is fairly representative...

Last trip to the track(8/27) was hot and humid and the car ran 13.9s at 98+ mph in a bracket race. Everyone was off 2-3 tenths in their typical ETs.

So far, the results show the 4.30s being a better selection than the 4.10s. The corrected averages show a top end improvement.

before 4.30s - 13.660 @ 99.95
after 4.30s - 13.582 @ 100.66
difference - (0.078) sec ~ 0.71 mph

I think the sixty foot times are hindered by mushy suspension components. They should be better.

:burnout:

 

[brentalan]

Cool, thanks!