Oh NOOooooo, there's no Vast Right-Wing Conspiricy in this country!

[Calabrio]

Damn I thought you describing the Bush Cabinet! You have it right on the money..

And you base this on what?

Oh but then you can't see the truth and have to look at it all through the Bush-Davidians concept, we will follow our corrupt leader to hell.

Would the simple fact that there was so much internal pressure to withdraw the Meirs nomination, mentioned in this thread, completely undermine your argument?

Why not look at the truth. Open your eyes for once!

Good advice, give it a try.

 

[JohnnyBz00LS]

You don't know crap about the SBVT. A group of outstanding guys thrust into the election because John Kerry and is big fat ego had to get up on stage and act like a war hero when the truth is he was far from that. After '4' deferments, he 'volunteers' for Vietnam after hearing his fifth and final deferment to go to Paris will be denied and he will be drafted instead of getting to pick and choose as he finally does. The Swift Boat guys are still being persecuted for telling the truth and are being sued to this day for making a documentary that exposed Kerry for the fraud that he is.

To borrow a worn-out passage from another fellow member......

Actually, I'm having more fun than ever watching you RWWs stewing in your own juices, spitting hate. I can just picture you angrily pounding on your keyboard as you typed that post.

There is a lawsuit against the SBVT?? Please do tell!!!

 

[JohnnyBz00LS]

Would the simple fact that there was so much internal pressure to withdraw the Meirs nomination, mentioned in this thread, completely undermine your argument?

That "pressure" to withdraw Meirs was EXternal, not INternal. She's an old pal of GW's, remember??

 

[fossten]

That "pressure" to withdraw Meirs was EXternal, not INternal. She's an old pal of GW's, remember??

Shows our party leaders can be influenced by us, but not by the screaming left.

 

[fossten]

To borrow a worn-out passage from another fellow member......



There is a lawsuit against the SBVT?? Please do tell!!!

Hah. You don't borrow, you distort and misquote.

Typical fib tactic learned straight from Dan Rather.

 

[MonsterMark]

That "pressure" to withdraw Meirs was EXternal, not INternal. She's an old pal of GW's, remember??

Do you all RWWs follow Bush blindly or not. Make up your mind.

Miers was not the best choice, period. Bush tried to placate the Democrats. Screw that and screw them. That is the message that Bush heard loud and clear.

 

[MonsterMark]

There is a lawsuit against the SBVT?? Please do tell!!!

If you were serious in your comment, I would. But I don't believe you are, therefore, look it up yourself.:F

 

[TheDude]

Do you all RWWs follow Bush blindly or not. Make up your mind.

Miers was not the best choice, period. Bush tried to placate the Democrats. Screw that and screw them. That is the message that Bush heard loud and clear.

Lol., When she was first nominated, the RWW's here were defending Bush for choosing her and flinging feces at the Lefties for saying that Bush choose her for all the wrong reasons (i.e. Religious beliefs, Friendship etc.). Now that the Far Right has chewed her and spit her out all of you jump on the "She was a bad choice and it was a mistake" and 'We' fixed it ourselves' bandwagon.

Truth is, if she didn't decline and was still up for nomination, all the righties would still be defending Bush for choosing her.

 

[fossten]

Lol., When she was first nominated, the RWW's here were defending Bush for choosing her and flinging feces at the Lefties for saying that Bush choose her for all the wrong reasons (i.e. Religious beliefs, Friendship etc.). Now that the Far Right has chewed her and spit her out all of you jump on the "She was a bad choice and it was a mistake" and 'We' fixed it ourselves' bandwagon.

Truth is, if she didn't decline and was still up for nomination, all the righties would still be defending Bush for choosing her.

See, that proves that you don't pay any attention to what Conservatives do or say. You probably just swallow your opposition party's talking points without examining the facts.

The fact is that the Conservative community was critical and cautious of Miers from the MOMENT she was nominated. The only people defending her were Bush and his cabinet. I was unsure about her, so was Bryan. JOHNNY admits that the Conservative pressure got her to withdraw. Even the Democrat senators didn't know what to think. They actually liked her a little. If that ain't a red flag, what is?

Truth is, if she didn't decline and was still up for nomination, all the righties would still be questioning this pick by Bush and continuing to check her background.

 

[JohnnyBz00LS]

Shows our party leaders can be influenced by us, but not by the screaming left.

So quitcherbitchin about the "liberal" MSM!

 

[JohnnyBz00LS]

Do you <think> all RWWs follow Bush blindly or not. Make up your mind.

Miers was not the best choice, period. Bush tried to placate the Democrats. Screw that and screw them. That is the message that Bush heard loud and clear.

And a pleasent surpise, it was. I didn't want any of GW's "butt buddies" on the bench either.

 

[TheDude]

See, that proves that you don't pay any attention to what Conservatives do or say. You probably just swallow your opposition party's talking points without examining the facts.

The fact is that the Conservative community was critical and cautious of Miers from the MOMENT she was nominated. The only people defending her were Bush and his cabinet. I was unsure about her, so was Bryan. JOHNNY admits that the Conservative pressure got her to withdraw. Even the Democrat senators didn't know what to think. They actually liked her a little. If that ain't a red flag, what is?

Truth is, if she didn't decline and was still up for nomination, all the righties would still be questioning this pick by Bush and continuing to check her background.

Go back and read the thread titled 'Will Bush Ever Tell The Truth'. It was posted when Miers was first nominated. I did not see one post from anyone in the right flat out denouncing Bush for his bad choice like there is now. As usual, the thread turned into a different topic fairly quick, so only the first page and a half is about the Miers nomination. Also, I am not talking about the ENTIRE conservative community, I was referring to the conservatives in here. I stated so in my post.

As far as not swallowing your parties talking points without taking in facts, take a good look at yourself before you point the finger.

 

[MonsterMark]

...I was referring to the conservatives in here.

Here was my 1st post on the subject.

"You're not being gun shy. The left thinks she is a weak candidate is all. On the right, we want to make sure OUR candidate moves this court to the right. We have had enough of the Souters and Ginsbergs, thank you. Has nothing to do with lack of judicial experience. Over half of the Supreme Court justices had no prior bench experience. We want and deserve a CONSERVATIVE. We want and deserve a guaranteed CONSERVATIVE."

I wanted a conservative and when I found out she was not conservative enough for me, I objected.