97silverlsc said:To bryan, fossie and calabrio- let the name calling and dismissal of the article begin.
..You've never found a problem that couldn't be solved by throwing other people's money at it, have you?
97silverlsc said:To bryan, fossie and calabrio- let the name calling and dismissal of the article begin.
95DevilleNS said:Your guy tries to fuse evolution and creation together but in a ridiculous time table.
Go throw your average garden variety goldfish into a low salt water mixture of sg 1.010, it will die within 10 minutes, throw one is full salt water 1.025+ and it dies in about 1 minute. (Yes, I have done this, I own fresh, brackish and salt water aquariums) The same goes for most (there are exceptions) tropical and cold climate fresh water fish and your guy claims that this is due to natural selection in the past 4k years or so? Rubbish.
There are huge gaps in his hypothesis, he doesn't account for amphibians which most species have a zero tolerance to salt, he doesn't account for insects which happen to be the largest and most diverse group on the planet, I think there is something along the lines of 350k+ species of beetles alone and yet they all survived?
As far as seeds surviving being soaked for 150 days in salt water, ya, some are adapted to surviving in salt water but not all or even the majority. Thousands of different species of trees, bushes, shrubs, flowering plants etc. all survived by seeds floating around in water world? That is a far stretch.
fossten said:Why wouldn't the insects have entered the ark? You forgot to consider that part.
And in case you didn't learn this in grade school, amphibians can breathe air and swim on watery surfaces. Any land-locked amphibians would have been loaded into the ark.
You're resting your entire faith in evolution on one amateur experiment with a goldfish? Please tell me you've got more evidence than that.
So you, unlike the scientific experiments conducted by real scientists, managed to kill a goldfish. Hmm. I'm not impressed. But you're too closed-minded to accept scientific data when it's presented to you, as with the seed data. Just you saying it's a stretch doesn't make it so.
So I can see that you are going to stubbornly reject any truth that's placed before you if it refutes evolution. If that's the case, fine, but don't EVER talk to me about evolution SCIENCE vs. Creation science again. You won't accept any science that refutes evolution, which shows that you are trusting evolution by faith and NOT SCIENCE.
Calabrio said:Did anyone watch this documentary: The Exodus Decoded
I thought it was fascinating, it will be available for sale from Amazon.com next week: The Exodus Decoded (History Channel) (2006)
Volcanic eruption 'triggered biblical parting of Red Sea'
Tony Allen-Mills, New York