God is Only a Theory

cammerfe said:
'People' are you and others of your ilk who seem to base the worthwhileness of their existence on being able to say something negative about other people.
Click to expand...
i don't run around putting people down ks. this is a forum for debate and opinions. if you can't handle it, don't participate.
if you want to chose a side, be prepared to defend it and stop being a hurt snowflake. :D
 
well ks, i'm not offended by you, so it doesn't apply. and i'm fairly centrist.
but you sure seem offended at anything that doesn't jibe with your imaginary friend view. :eek:
snowflake.
(although 2 is now 3)
 
hrmwrm said:
well ks, i'm not offended by you, so it doesn't apply. and i'm fairly centrist.
but you sure seem offended at anything that doesn't jibe with your imaginary friend view. :eek:
snowflake.
(although 2 is now 3)
Click to expand...

There's a problem with using a definition other than the main one and you display it clearly. As an example:

By your standards, I'd be classified as 'Handsome'. (I'm actually very ordinary to look at.)
One of the 'down-the-page' definitions of handsome is 'moderately large' and the example is given as "a handsome sum of money".

Actually, as you well know, 'snowflake' is a derogatory label for one who is uncertain, emotionally vulnerable, and is applied to young liberal/progressives who deem themselves to be incapable of discussing any other opinion but their own. They often become violent when their ideas are questioned. As you do, although on the internet it's difficult to be physically violent so you content yourself with verbal attacks.

You'll note that, in all the exchanges we've had over the last few years, you've attacked---and attempted to heap calumny on some person or group of people---and I've simply replied and pointed out the gaps in your line of thinking. Go look in the mirror and re-evaluate yourself.

Ken
 
Last edited:
hrmwrm said:
you prove jesus as a real person and i'll be amazed. :rolleyes:
biblical references don't count.
(you know krishna was a virgin birth? romulus too? dionysus? zoroaster? horus? all virgin births. and like jesus, all myths)
Click to expand...
Waiting patiently hrm? Just one example will do...
 
cammerfe said:
By your standards, I'd be classified as 'Handsome'. (I'm actually very ordinary to look at.)
Click to expand...
don't know you, never seen you, and can't judge.

cammerfe said:
You'll note that, in all the exchanges we've had over the last few years, you've attacked---and attempted to heap calumny on some person or group of people---and I've simply replied and pointed out the gaps in your line of thinking. Go look in the mirror and re-evaluate yourself.
Click to expand...
sure, i show you the fallacies of the bible, but i have gaps in MY thinking?
you still don't realize the problem of the bible as the authority of the bible, do you? :rolleyes:

since you're christian, it would hardly make sense for me to point out the same problems of any other religion, since you stand in defence of yours.
there is no difference between you and a muslim, hindu, or buddhist. i'm not attacking a group of people, nor a person, i'm attacking a mythology.
if you want to be some hurt snowflake over that, so be it.
 
hrmwrm said:
don't know you, never seen you, and can't judge.


sure, i show you the fallacies of the bible, but i have gaps in MY thinking?
you still don't realize the problem of the bible as the authority of the bible, do you? :rolleyes:

since you're christian, it would hardly make sense for me to point out the same problems of any other religion, since you stand in defence of yours.
there is no difference between you and a muslim, hindu, or buddhist. i'm not attacking a group of people, nor a person, i'm attacking a mythology.
if you want to be some hurt snowflake over that, so be it.
Click to expand...

You weren't invited to judge. I simply made an observation regarding your dictionary use as justification for your mis-use of terminology.

Why do you find it necessary to attack other people? Study and observation suggests that doing so is a way for you to feel better about yourself. It's not necessary, and actually counter-productive. You're probably a good guy, without the necessity for the attacks.

Ken
 
cammerfe said:
Why do you find it necessary to attack other people? Study and observation suggests that doing so is a way for you to feel better about yourself. It's not necessary, and actually counter-productive. You're probably a good guy, without the necessity for the attacks.
Click to expand...
well ks, i haven't tried to make it personal, but there are those who have come here and done the same. you should ask the same question of yourself. and expect the same answer.
maybe i tit for tat, but pointing out the fuckin obvious is hardly attacking.
hHDO1S2.jpg


JqjX3xp.jpg
 
cammerfe said:
This whole thread is an attack, started by you.
Click to expand...
i haven't been a part for a lot of it. there are those who attacked each other as to what they thought was right in christianity.
if you didn't like the DISCUSSION, you didn't need to participate, ken.
attack is your opinion. :rolleyes:
 
what wording is that ken? truth? facts? reality?
that's not an attack, it's enlightenment. :D

fjKBtef.jpg


FFSQHtL.jpg


nk7ubKV.jpg


MJwZQEt.png


nuBK5nx.png
 
reposting what ken? i went looking and found no doubles.

UapFPRB.jpg


Dx785F8.jpg


K2CYMEg.png


MKfqv2D.jpg


IZZf09Z.jpg
 
You are surprisingly good at being obtuse. Obviously you are copying your pictorial memes from somewhere else and re-posting them. Or else you are a remarkably gifted graphic artist! Nah, it's the first suggestion. As I've said before, you're simply a small whiny imp, snarking and gibbering at others to make you feel better about yourself.

Ken
 
some critical thinking just reaching out to take you over. so, wtf you whining about? a bible quote is a repost.
guess that gibbering makes someone feel good about themselves.
you're the small whiny imp gibbering at me. do you feel good ken?:eek:
does it make you feel better about yourself?:rolleyes:
 
hrmwrm said:
i don't run around putting people down ks. this is a forum for debate and opinions. if you can't handle it, don't participate.
Click to expand...

THAT's laughable. This isn't a debate. You're running a bully pulpit,,, and using it to push your own rhetoric!!!!!!!!

However,,, either there is more than one form, (denomination?) of atheism... or you are a heretic of your own faith.

What is Atheism? | American Atheists
American Atheists › Activism › Resources
  1. Cached
  2. Similar
Atheism is one thing: A lack of belief in gods. Atheism is not an affirmative belief that there is no god nor does it answer any other question about what a person believes. ... Atheism is too often defined incorrectly as a belief system.

_____________________________________________________________
Obviously... I highlighted the part, (in green), that is in conflict with what you have been posting here for the last couple years.
 
cammerfe said:
You are surprisingly good at being obtuse.
Click to expand...

That's because it's intentional. It keeps him from having to admit he's wrong. Closest I've ever been to him admitting I was right... was him calling me a "smug prick". If he needs to have the last word that bad... let him have it. He'll be talking to a very large echo,,, when no one is there to respond.

Not to mention that his inane nastiness... is childish at best... and bad form for what is supposedly a "debate".
 
hrmwrm said: ↑
"you prove jesus as a real person and i'll be amazed. :rolleyes:
biblical references don't count."


WELL?????????????????????????? And I didn't use or include Biblical references. Just ROMAN history!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 97 (members: 2, guests: 95)
Back
Top