How do you feel about Biden NOW?

Screenshot_20231027-132837.png
 
I already replied that the first time you posted it:

"More 2nd Amendment friendly house" -snip

Um. People with a history of mental illness, making threats of violence and spending time in mental facilities can still legally own assault riffles and go on mass shooting sprees like the one we just had in Maine, which is still ongoing. So how much more "friendly" do they plan on making it?

What we know so far about the mass shooting in Maine

And no one is surprised the deranged shooter is a Trump loving Rightist. Go NRA! Go Republicans!
 
TheDude said:
Um. People with a history of mental illness, making threats of violence and spending time in mental facilities can still legally own assault riffles and go on mass shooting sprees like the one we just had in Maine, which is still ongoing. So how much more "friendly" do they plan on making it?
Click to expand...
They are making it "gun friendly" for people who are allowed to legally own firearms. Anyone who has been adjudicated "mentally defective" is not allowed to legally own a firearm.

Sorry... but even the Democrats can't close all the loopholes... without legally affecting everyone's gun rights

If you look at the ATF form 4473, there are a series of questions that are asked.

Problem is... people can lie, (like Hunter), or they can go to a gun show and buy something... avoiding the federal background check.

Thus the mentioning of (closing) the "gun show loophole" by certain people. I am not opposed to that.
 
04_Sport_LS said:
They are making it "gun friendly" for people who are allowed to legally own firearms. Anyone who has been adjudicated "mentally defective" is not allowed to legally own a firearm.

Sorry... but even the Democrats can't close all the loopholes... without legally affecting everyone's gun rights

If you look at the ATF form 4473, there are a series of questions that are asked.

Problem is... people can lie, (like Hunter), or they can go to a gun show and buy something... avoiding the federal background check.

Thus the mentioning of (closing) the "gun show loophole" by certain people. I am not opposed to that.
Click to expand...

There's literally a mentally ill person, with a history of making threats, who murdered 18 people, wounded more, his guns were legally owned and he's still on the run from the law, so he could murder more before he's caught.

So how's that working out for "gun friendly" Republicans?
 
So the guy "slipped through the cracks" and went cuckoo. That doesn't make it a Republican issue. It's a multi-party issue. As shown above, Maine is one of the most liberal States in the country... and probably has some of the most lax gun laws in the country..
 
So a "liberal" State does very little when it comes to gun control. That figures.:rolleyes:

Who knows where he got the guns. Probably NOT through a gun shop. Most likely he got them at a gun show.
 
Last edited:
You need to think twice before running your mouth... because all you do is put your foot in it.

Or... "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."
 
^A grown man doing pretend wins? Oh my! Anyhow.


FunFact: Doesn't matter if a state has the most restrictive guns laws, like California, when you can go next door to Nevada and get whatever you want with a smile and a wad of cash and come back. It's why we need sweeping Federal gun reforms laws.

As always, Republicans/Conservatives only care about atrocities if they're personally affected. eg if you had lost a loved one in this most recent mass murder, you'd be singing a different tune.
 
TheDude said:
FunFact: Doesn't matter if a state has the most restrictive guns laws, like California, when you can go next door to Nevada and get whatever you want with a smile and a wad of cash and come back. It's why we need sweeping Federal gun reforms laws.
Click to expand...
Yup... and I pointed that out to you months ago. I told you people were driving over to Nevada or Arizona to get ammo, just to save on Cali's ridiculous "background check" fee on ammo.

Cali has its own problems though... for such a restrictive State.
 
Last edited:
TheDude said:
As always, Republicans/Conservatives only care about atrocities if they're personally affected. eg if you had lost a loved one in this most recent mass murder, you'd be singing a different tune.
Click to expand...
You seem to have forgotten... that in a different thread (a number of months ago)... I mentioned my family suffered loss due to gun violence.

Does that count as "personally affected" ???

Let me know when you go through the same. Then we can have a REAL talk. You might want to get off the "happy grass" first... So you can comprehend the RAW reality. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 113 (members: 0, guests: 113)
Back
Top