Telco
Dedicated LVC Member
Why does everyone feel the need to blame the engineer for the substandard quality of a part. Do you blame Ford for the crappy tires a dealer put on a car? Do you blame the grocery store for the poorly made toothbrush? A manufacturer has only so much control over its suppliers and unless there is a much higher than normal failure rate, usually doesn't know there is a problem. Ford wasn't slow to fix the window regulator problem once they discovered the substandard piece. IIRC, it took 3 revisions to fix the problem.
As to the cooling parts, don't forget that manufacturers are looking t save every gram of weight they can. Would you rather have gummint mandated safety features or metal cooling pieces? And yes, that is one of their options. Saving weight is EVERYTHING!!!!! Like Joe said, these cars are inexpensive enough that someone who would never be able to afford it new can now get it second or third or fourth hand. It's still a luxury car. How handy that can afford an LS can get a comparable Benz? Or BMW ? Or Audi? Or even Cadillac?
I had typed up a long response just to lose it when I hit post. Long and short of it is, yes. The blame lays at the feet of the engineers who designed this car. Part of an engineer's job is quality control, both of in-house manufacture and third party suppliers. In fact, Ford has a whole quality control department, made up of engineers. It's heinous that Ford would charge this much for a car with problems not found in a car at half its price, especially when we're talking about something like the plastic used in cooling systems or ignition coils which every single gasoline-powered car has been using for over 100 years.