:lol: :lol: :lol:huntz52 said:all in all i think we have come to a conclusion, F all your caddys and LINCOLNS my caddy is better than all yours STOCK!! you know why! i just saved tons of money of my car insurance by switching to Geico!!!!
LOL that should be a tv adhuntz52 said:all in all i think we have come to a conclusion, F all your caddys and LINCOLNS my caddy is better than all yours STOCK!! you know why! i just saved tons of money of my car insurance by switching to Geico!!!!
Red STS said:I recently went to see the movie Hostile last weekend. After the movie I was at the light with a Mark VIII. This punkass was really trying to get my attention to race at the light. I tried to just ignore it because I had a friendly female with her head in my lap. She noticed a horn blowing so she stopped. NOW I'M PISSED. This jerkoff f**ked up my bj. She says "I think he wants to race."
how about the 275 HP VE THE SEVILLES 275 hp? i THINK THAT WOULD BE CLOSEscott9050 said:Seville will be faster than a Conti. A Mark VIII will leave one as well, as long as it is cared for.
Aaron J Williams said:Ok, this is from the website www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html
1993 mark VIII 7.1 0-60, 15.4 quarter mile
1993 eldo ETC 6.7 0-60, 15.0 quarter mile
These guys say the caddy is faster than the lincoln.
I personally think the best thing about the lincoln is the front air bag suspension. When those bags leak and you shut the car off it lowers just like those lowrider cars! HAHAHAHA:N
Do lincolns have on board diagnostics that the driver can access at any time?
Seat memmory?
Bose sound system?
Magnetically dampened active suspension system?
OnStar?
Real woodgrain interior panels?
I do not think lincolns look like a bar of soap,more like a streched and dolled up taurus, Yummy!
On a final note, I just changed the timing chain and water pump on my 1990 fleetwood . both were original and the car has 210,000 miles on it and purrs like a kitten and pulls 18.5 mpg average. I've never seen a ford motor go 200,000 on the factory timing chain or water pump.
True, overall Cadillac is better then Lincoln in performance, but the Mark VIII is different then the other lincolnsMAC1 said:I owned an 87 LSC and while it was fast; however my 94 Eldorado (270 hp) would whip the LSC. While I respect Lincoln enthusiasm, I think it's pretty clear that Cadillac has the performance edge.
One mod that would benefit a Cadillac is a limited slip differential. This simple modification will improve overall traction as well as 0-60 performance by transferring power to both front wheels. Unfortunately, one bad thing about Cadillac is the lack of available mods.
MAC1 said:I owned an 87 LSC and while it was fast; however my 94 Eldorado (270 hp) would whip the LSC. While I respect Lincoln enthusiasm, I think it's pretty clear that Cadillac has the performance edge.
One mod that would benefit a Cadillac is a limited slip differential. This simple modification will improve overall traction as well as 0-60 performance by transferring power to both front wheels. Unfortunately, one bad thing about Cadillac is the lack of available mods.
:Iscott9050 said:Mark VII versus Mark VIII, my Mark VIII would kick the sh!t out of a stock one. That is not the argument.