Don,
I agree that there was a co-regency with Jehoshaphat and Jehoram, (both of Judah). That just proves my point even more. Jehoram received the prophecy from Elijah during that time... BEFORE Elijah was taken up in a chariot of fire. Try again!!!
Right after Elijah is taken up in 2nd Kings 2,,, you have 2nd Kings 3.
2nd kings 3 shows an alliance between Jehoram of Israel, and King Jehoshaphat... and Elisha is the prophet at that time. This was right after Elijah was taken up. This was during the co-regency with Jehoshaphat and Jehoram of Judah. So to dismiss the facts,,, in an attempt to support your views... is in errancy.
Also... 2nd Chronicles 22 wasn't the first time Elijah was in Judah. In 1st Kings 19,,, during the reign of Ahab... Elijah fled to Beersheba, (in Judah). Granted... Elijah was supposedly transported from place to place at times,,, just like some of the New Testament Apostles were... but at this point in Kings and Chronicles,,, Elijah was never seen or heard from again... until the Mount of Transfiguration.
I've also started digging into the writings of Josephus during the same time period. That is a bit of a hard read. But Josephus, (a Jewish Pharisee), even admits that according to the Old Testament and Talmudic traditions... that no one knew exactly what happened to Enoch or Elijah.
As you know well... I am not afraid to use your New World Translation,,, in support of Scripture. I looked up the verses about Enoch,,, and the Watchtower Society,,, may have another issue to reconcile.
In Genesis 5:24 YOUR version of the bible says this:
24 Eʹnoch kept walking with the true God.+ Then he was no more, for God took him.+
However... in Hebrews 11:5 Your version of the Bible says this:
5 By faith Eʹnoch+ was transferred so as not to see death, and he was nowhere to be found because God had transferred him;+ for before he was transferred he received the witness that he had pleased God well.
This is where YOU get the idea that Elijah was transferred... even though there is no place in the Bible,, (or Your NWT that I know of), that mentions this. And only the NWT seems to use the wrod "transferred" in Hebrews 11:5. I think you are taking the word transferred,,, to literally. Especially since in other places of the Bible... you are willing to look beyond the literal word,,, and see a future prophetic meaning,,, that might not actually be there.
Many Christian versions of the Bible... use the word "translated" in Hebrews 11:5,,, because there is a lacking definition from Hebrew to Greek... for the word "metetethē" found in Hebrews 11:5
Looking into the English language and it's complexities... and using Strong's Concordance,,, I have learned that another definition for "metetethē"... is "change". So in light of that understanding... look at Hebrews 11:5 to say "By Faith, Enoch was changed, so as not to see death".
So how was Enoch "changed" Don??? And if Enoch was transferred in the same way as Elijah,,, why is there no further mention of Enoch after Genesis 5:24??? It's for the same reason that there was no mention of Elijah,,, after he was taken up in a chariot of fire in 2nd Kings chapter 2!!! BOTH Enoch and Elijah were "changed".
Neither were heard from again... because for some reason neither YOU nor I can explain,,, God held them in special regard. You don't have the answer about Enoch or Elijah,,, and neither do I. So stop pretending you have all the answers,,, because YOU DON'T!!! There are Jewish books,,, that Pre-Date parts of the Bible... that Jewish scholars are still in debate about,,, but are referenced in the Bible in a way that most people don't know about. Take the Book of Jude as an example. It references the Book of Enoch... and much more. It "refers" to a Jewish book,,, known as "The Assumption of Moses".
So in some way... Moses was also special to God. No one knows the ultimate reason for why God hid his body. Again... you don't know for sure,,, and neither do I... so stop pretending you have all of the answers!!! You are NOT God... so don't act like you have it all figured out!!! A person who thinks that, (or projects that image of themselves),,, is DANGEROUSLY CLOSE to both Heresy... and Blasphemy... JUST EXACTLY like the Jewish Pharisees did during the time Jesus walked the earth!!!
You STILL ignore the SCRIPTURAL FACT that THE MOMENT Jesus died... that "tombs were opened",,, and those, (people from the grave), were seen walking around Jerusalem.
AGAIN DON!!! Jesus took HIS throne the moment HE died... and THAT'S WHY AND WHEN the Fatihful "received the promise" mentioned in Hebrews. It didn't happen in the "midst of his enemies" in 1914... like you were taught to believe. In fact,,, if my understanding is correct... the JW's revised not only their beliefs,,, but the NWT too,,, when Jesus didn't come in 1914... which is why you believe what you believe now!!! NEITHER the BIBLE... Nor GOD"S WORD changes,,, just because a human is misguided in their own understanding!!!
I am very well aware of what happened on the Mount of Transfiguration... so there is no need to tell me,,, when you haven't responded about that in past posts where I mentioned it. Too late Don!!!
Quote Don:
"So you SHOULD listen to him,04,as God said, and BELIEVE that John 3:13 was NOT a lie spoken by Jesus,even though it has been told you from many years back."
Actually Don... I hadn't given much thought to John 3:13 before you mentioned it. So to ACCUSE that I have been TAUGHT a lie... is a misconception on your part. So Keep accusing!!! That's what satan does best!!! AND AGAIN... I don't think Jesus is lying!!! I just think there is more to what Jesus is saying,,, that EXCLUDES Enoch, Moses, AND Elijah. Maybe I am wrong... but I am sure I will find out someday. Actually... I look forward to finding out from God Himself!!! However,,, that doesn't mean I am going to accept YOUR truth... as GOD's truth. You ARE NOT God,,, so don't tell me you have it all figured out!!!
AGAIN Don... You don't perfectly know,,, because you are NOT God. So AGAIN... don't project yourself as one who has all of the anwers,,, because YOU DON'T!!!
Quote Don:
"How bout John the Baptist? Jesus said:`Among men born of women there was not a greater than John. But the least one in the kingdom of the heavens is greater than he."
Already went down that road with you many posts back Don... in post #303:
Quote myself... and You Don:
"Quote Don:
"OR do you think Jesus was lying when he said at Matt. 11:11-12 that even though John the Baptist was unsurpassed as a person in God's eyes, he was not in the same class as one of the LESSER ones in heaven."
Here we may have a slight "translation" ,(and/or interpretation), issue:
NWT:
11 Truly I say to you, among those born of women, there has not been raised up anyone greater than John the Baptist, but a lesser person in the Kingdom of the heavens is greater than he is.+
NASB, (but all of 15 or so Christian translations say pretty much the same thing):
11“Truly I say to you, among those born of women there has not arisen anyone greater than John the Baptist! Yet the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
Here in Matthew,,, Jesus is referencing himself... but that might be hard to understand because of how the NWT chooses it's wording. If you think I am wrong about my interpretation of Matthew 11,,, don't forget that the Bible also says "for a little while Jesus made himself lower than the Angels." In other words,,, for a little while Jesus made Himself the "least/lesser" in the Kingdom of Heaven... by becoming human."
End quote of post #303
Again Don... Jesus is referencing HIMSELF when He said this about John the Baptist,,, and made HIMSELF "least" in the Kindom of Heaven. That's why Jesus is STLL greater than John the Baptist... while John the Baptist was "unsurpassed as a person in God's eyes", (quoting your paraphrase of the Bible).
As I quoted Judge Judy as saying:
"If you tell the truth, you don't have to have a good memory"
Seems as though you don't have a good memory Don,,, because as in the other thread... you keep trying to take me in circles. Either that... or your twisting of my words is intentional to make yourself look credible. Thankfully... I do have a good memory,,, and I'm not gonna let you do that... AND I'm NOT gonna let YOU put words in my mouth,,, that I DID NOT say!!!
It seems it may be time for this thread to be "locked"... as happened in the last thread you and I got into a debate about Scripture and God.
WRM. The choice is yours and up to you. However,,, there is another way for everyone else to continue this discussion... without Don's interference.
I have figured out how to block a person... and ignore their posts. Just click on their name in this or any thread... then click on "view profile". When you get to that page... below their name,,, you will see a link to "add to ignore list". Just click on that link... and it will keep you from seeing any post they make "site wide".
I am going to do this regarding Don,,, and anyone who doesn't wish to listen to my BS anymore... is welcome to do the same to me.
So... "goodbye Don"!!! Have fun with your twisting of TRUTH and other people words,,, and your lies... and accusations elsewhere. I'm done with you!!! Once again you are getting another door closed in your face... mostly because your "beside manner",,, SUCKS... AND is self serving!!!
One last thing... Quote Cam to Don in post #338:
"Don, do you feel that you get 'brownie-points' from inanities?"
No Cam... Don thinks he gets brownie-points with God for proselytizing someone else to his beliefs. "Works" earning grace... rather than GRACE causing "works".
Goodbye Don... and good riddance!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!